Verbatim header image 2

Post project reviews

June 24th, 2009 · No Comments

Seven project and programme managers contributed to a recent online discussion that covered good practice, processes, metrics, and handling the results of post project reviews.

  • A common issue is that feedback is captured on a project-by-project basis with no central repository. This results in a lack of consistency in the way feedback is captured and often prevents subsequent projects benefiting from the feedback.
  • Have processes in place to capture post-project feedback. Two main mechanisms for feedback are Post- Implementation Review (PIR) and Lessons Learned. Aim for this to be part of the embedded culture.
  • There is no set time after project closure for gathering feedback. Decide at project closure when the feedback will be gathered.
  • A key to success is keeping the relationship open. Project size influences the size of the project review. The degree of formality is the same regardless of project size
  • A key message is ‘Create documentation during the project life cycle for PIR and Lessons Learned.’

Reports are free to organisations subscribing to the Corporate IT Forum - Want to know more?

Tags: Architecture & Strategy · Business Relations & IT Policy · Programme & Project Management · Technologies

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment